| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Phillips v. AWH Corp. ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Phillips v. AWH Corp.
''Phillips v. AWH Corp.'', 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005), was a case decided by the Federal Circuit that clarified the hierarchy of evidentiary sources usable for claim construction in patent law.〔Adelman, M.J., Rader, R.R., and Klancnik, G.P. ''Patent Law In A Nutshell''. Thomson West, St. Paul, MN. 2008, p. 301〕
==Factual background==
The patents at issue were for modular steel shell panels that could be arranged into vandalism resistant walls. The panels interlocked by means of steel baffles - internal barriers meant to create fillable compartments or to deflect projectiles that penetrate the outer wall. Defendant AWH Corporation distributed similar modular panels, and Plaintiff, Phillips, sued AWH for patent infringement. AWH asserted that its panels did not meet all of the limitations of Phillips' patent claims. The District Court granted AWH's summary judgment motion for noninfringement because it read the term "baffles" in the claims to mean internal barriers angled at angles other than 90 degrees. AWH's panels had baffles angled at 90 degrees.〔''Phillips v. AWH Corp.'', 415 F.3d 1303, 1309-11 (Fed. Cir. 2005)〕 Phillips appealed to the Federal Circuit. The panel affirmed the judgment of noninfringement, but on different grounds from the District Court. The Federal Circuit then agreed to rehear the case en banc.〔''Phillips'', 415 F.3d at 1310〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Phillips v. AWH Corp.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|